Welcome to Compliance Standards LLC
Client Portal
Become a Client

Vendors

 Sign up to the Tech-Check Newsletter | Subsribe to the Sector Pulse Service

IBM’s 2025 Breach Data Puts ITAD Providers Inside the Vendor-Risk Perimeter

The global average breach cost at $4.44 million, according to IBM. Healthcare leads all industries at $7.42 million, followed by financial services at $5.56 million, industrial at $5.00 million, energy at $4.83 million, and technology at $4.79 million. Supply-chain compromise, where ITAD sists, ranks as the second-costliest attack vector at $4.91 million per incident, trailing only malicious insider incidents at $4.92 million. Phishing averages $4.80 million and stolen credentials $4.67 million. For ITAD providers, the supply-chain figure is the number that matters. Enterprise procurement teams now treat disposition vendors as part of the same risk perimeter as any other third party with access to sensitive data. Governance maturity, documentation quality, and audit readiness are becoming primary evaluation criteria, alongside processing capacity and recovery rates. Providers serving healthcare and financial services face buyers with the highest breach-cost exposure and the strongest incentive to demand governance-mature partners.

Read More

M&A: Telamon acquires 21-year-old ITAD consultancy Retire-IT, retaining founder Kyle Marks

Jul 8, 2026

Telamon Corporation has acquired Retire-IT, with founder Kyle Marks staying on as VP of ITAD services under Telamon’s enterprise services division. The deal follows Telamon’s 2025 hire of Mark Vander Kooy, a former ITAD executive whose earlier company was acquired into what became CloudBlue — a sequence that reads as a company using an experienced operator to identify a target before buying one.

What makes this deal notable is that Retire-IT doesn’t process equipment; it’s a managed-service and tracking layer that oversees roughly three dozen certified processors on clients’ behalf, a model Marks calls “defensible IT disposition.” Marks argues the acquisition points to a broader shift in enterprise ITAD, away from processors vouching for their own compliance and toward separating execution from independent oversight, though whether that’s an industry-wide trend or one operator’s thesis remains to be seen. Full analysis, including Telamon’s revenue and customer figures, sourcing details, and the two open questions likely to matter most to clients of both firms, available to Compliance Standards subscribers.

Client Brief: Samsung Just Posted the Largest Tech Profit Yet Reported: Old Memory Now Costs More Than AI Chips

Jul 8, 2026

Samsung’s Q2 2026 operating profit of roughly KRW89.4 trillion (~$58.4 billion) is attributed almost entirely to its memory business. The South Korean tech giant has not yet disclosed a divisional breakdown but market expectation is that the Device Solutions (DRAM, NAND, HBM) division carried the bulk of the profit, while the consumer electronics division posted comparatively weak results due to its own rising component costs.
The mechanism behind that is directly relevant to component pricing in the ITAD channel. DRAM contract prices are up 58–63% quarter-on-quarter and NAND Flash up 70–75% QoQ. Legacy memory has been hit hardest by scarcity, with DDR4 spot pricing running above even advanced HBM3e, which is a real inversion where end-of-life memory costs more per gigabit than the chip industry’s most advanced product.

That inversion is the number to watch. It means components pulled from older, decommissioned enterprise hardware are sitting on unusually strong resale value right now. Industry commentary places relief no earlier than late 2027–2028, so this is a multi-quarter pricing environment, not a one-time spike, though it is a window, not a new floor.